That tree looks bronchial, that boulder could be a gall bladder, and everything around them looks like healthy, blood-soaked tissue. I mean, I think this is because of some aging issues; I guess it’s possible this looked like this when new? Who here was alive in 1965 and has an incredible visual memory? Happy Friday, champions. Rotate tires = landscape Throw out bearing = colonoscopy Prius cabin air filter = landscape Mustang cabin air filter = colonoscopy (from what I hear) The background looks like it may be a painting, though the graininess could be the result of shooting in low light. That would explain the reddish tint, but then a filter would also cause that. The car definitely looks like an illustration, which was pretty normal for ads in the ’60s. GM employed several artists who painted the cars in their ads. Some of their work actually looked better than the real cars. Major clues for me are the lack of visible seating in the car and the way the light on it defies physics. The way it’s lit up it should be casting shadows behind it. Instead, all the light behind the car is coming from the right. The lighting on the people is off as well.
